Learning machining stability using a bayesian model

Authors

  • Advait Pujari Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
  • Harsh Singh Rajput Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
  • Mohit Law Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
  • Manjesh K. Singh Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58368/MTT.22.2.2023.10-16

Keywords:

Machining Stability, Bayesian Learning, Machine Learning

Abstract

Instabilities in machining can be detrimental. Usually, analytical model-predicted stability charts guide selection of cutting parameters to ensure stable processes. However, since inputs to the model seldom account for the speed-dependent behaviour of the cutting process or the dynamics, models often fail to guide stable cutting parameter selection in real industrial settings. To address this issue, this paper discusses how real experimentally classified stable and unstable cutting data with all its vagaries and uncertainties can instead be used to learn the stability behaviour using a supervised Bayes' learning approach. We expand previously published work to systematically characterize how probability distributions, training data size, and thresholding influence the learning capacity of the Bayesian approach. Prediction accuracies of up to 95% are shown to be possible. We also show how the approach nicely extends itself to a continuous learning process. Results can hence inform further development towards self-optimizing and autonomous machining systems.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aggogeri, F., Pellegrini, N., &Tagliani F. L. (2021). Recent advances on machine learning applications in machining processes. Applied sciences, 11(18), 8764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app11188764

Chen, G., Li, Y., Liu X., & Yang, B. (2021).Physics-informed bayesian inference for milling stability analysis.International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 167. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103767

Denkana, B., Bergmann, B., & Reimer, S. (2020). Analysis of different machine learning algorithms to learn stability lobe diagram.Procedia CIRP, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procir.2020.05.049

Friedrich, J., Hinze C., Renner A., Verl A., &Lechler A. (2017). Estimation of stability lobe diagrams in milling with continuous learning algorithms. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 43, 124-134. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j .r c i m . 2015.10.003

Friedrich, J., Torzewski, J., &Verl, A. (2018). Online learning of stability lobe diagrams in milling. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procir.2017.12.213

Karandikar, J., Honeycutt, A., Schmitz, T., & Smith, S. (2020). Stability boundary and optimal operating parameter identification in milling using Bayesian learning.Journal of Manufacturing Processes 56.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.019

Sahu, G. N., & Law, M., (2022). Hardware-in-the-loop simulator for emulation and active control of chatter.HardwareX.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00273

Sahu, G. N., Vashisht, S., Wahi, P., & Law, M. (2020). Validation of a hardware-in-the-loop simulator for investigating and actively damping regenerative chatter in orthogonal cutting.CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 115-129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.03.002

Schmitz T., Cornelius A., Karandikar J., Tyler C. & Smith S. (2022). Receptance coupling substructure analysis and chatter frequency-informed machine learning for milling stability. CIRP Annals, 71(1), 321-324. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.03.020

Downloads

Published

01-02-2023

How to Cite

Pujari , A., Rajput, H. S., Law, M., & Singh, M. K. (2023). Learning machining stability using a bayesian model. Manufacturing Technology Today, 22(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.58368/MTT.22.2.2023.10-16