Examination and analysis of effect of printing parameters on roundness of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts

Authors

  • Sairaj Bharat Patil D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India
  • Tejas Uttam Mohite D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India
  • Tushar Ajit Patole D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India
  • Chinmay Vinayak Sutar D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India
  • Adish Ashish Mandavkar D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India
  • Sunil Jaysing Raykar D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, India

Keywords:

3D Printing, Roundness, Fused Deposition Modelling, Dimensional Accuracy, Geometric Tolerance

Abstract

The focus of the current research is on how different process variables affect geometrical tolerance, specifically how round a cylindrical PLA component is when printed using fused deposition modelling. Layer Thickness, Infill Percentage, and Print Speed are the three process parameters chosen for the current investigation. Examination and Analysis of Effect of Printing Parameters on Roundness of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Parts is presented. It is found during investigation that layer height is most significant aspect for roundness of fused deposition modelling printed parts. From current analysis, it is found that the minimum roundness value is at 0.12 mm Layer Height, 90% Infill Density and Print Speed 60 mm/s.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

AS1100 (1984) Technical Drawing, Part 201–1984, Mechanical Drawing, Standards Australia, Sydney.

ASME Y14.5 (2009) Dimensioning and Tolerancing, ASME, New York.

Boschetto., A, &Bottini L. (2014). Accuracy prediction in Fused Deposition Modeling.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73, 913-928.

Boschetto, A., &Bottini, L. (2016). Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 103-114.

Chinmay, V. S., Mandavkar, A. A., Patil, S. B., Mohite, T. U., Patole, T. A., &Raykar, S. (2022). Analysis and prediction of working range of process parameters for surface roughness of 3D printed parts with fused deposition modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 17(2), 044–050. https://doi. org/10.37255/jme.v17i2pp044-050.

D’Addona, D. M., Raykar, S. J., Singh, D., &Kramar, D. (15-17 July 2020). 14th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering.CIRP ICME ´20.

Deomore, S. A., Raykar, S. J. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making paradigm for selection of best printing parameters of fused deposition modeling. Materials Today. Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.632

Lieneke, T., Adam, G., Leuders, S., Knoop, F., Josupeit, S., Delfs, P., Funke, N., & Zimmer, D. (2015).Systematical determination of tolerances for additive manufacturing by measuring linear dimensions.International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 371-384.

Mahesh, M., Wong, Y. S., FuhJ, .Y. H., &Loh, H. T. (2004).Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes.Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10(2), 123–135.

Nagendra, J., &Ganesha Prasad, M. S. (2020). FDM process parameter optimization by taguchi technique for augmenting the mechanical properties of nylon-aramid composite used as filament material.Institution of Engineers (India): Ser. C, 101(2), 313-322.

Nagendra, J., Ganesha Prasad, M. S., Shashank, S., Syed, M. A. (2018). Comparison of tribiologicalbehavior of Nylon Aramid Polymer Composite Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling and Injection Molding Process.International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 720-728.

Ollison, T., &Berisso, K. (2010). Three-dimensional printing build variables that impact cylindricity. Journal of Industrial Technology, 26(1), 1-10.

Patil, P., Raykar, S. J., Bhamu, J., & Singh, D. (2022).Modeling and analysis of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling based on infill patterns. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 29, February 2022, 92-99.

Patil, P., Singh, D., Raykar, S. J., Bhamu, J. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of process parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) for printing polylactic acid (PLA) polymer components. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 4880-4885. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.353

Raykar S. J., &D’Addona, D. M., (2020). Selection of best printing parameters of fused deposition modeling using VIKOR. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 344-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matpr.2019.11.104

Raykar S. J., Narke M. M., Desai S. B., &Warke S. S. (2020). Manufacturing of 3d printed sports helmet. Techno-Societal 2018, 771-778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16962-6_77

Sood A. K. (2011). Study on parametric optimization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process. National Institue of Technology Rourkela, India.

Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., &Mahapatra, S. S. (2009).Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method.Materials and Design, 30, 4243-4252.

Downloads

Published

01-09-2022

How to Cite

Patil, S. B., Mohite, T. U., Patole, T. A., Sutar, C. V., Mandavkar, A. A., & Raykar, S. J. (2022). Examination and analysis of effect of printing parameters on roundness of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts. Manufacturing Technology Today, 21(9-10), 17–22. Retrieved from https://mtt.cmti.res.in/index.php/journal/article/view/70

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.